DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-luna
Creator
DeepSeek
OpenAI
Released
Sep 14, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
400K
Max output
944K (best)
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5
$0.10 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5
$0.50 (best)
Providers
5 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.5 (best)
38.1
Accepts
Text, Image
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-6 Luna are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 400,000-token context window, costs $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 38.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna is the cheapest on input, 2× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the largest context window and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-luna", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis