Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5.1
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-luna
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Context window
1M (best)
400K
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.10 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$0.50 (best)
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
51.2 (best)
38.1
CodingArtificial Analysis index
79.1
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna: summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Luna are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 400,000-token context window, costs $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 38.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna is the cheapest on input, 100× cheaper than the next model, Claude Fable 5.1 has the largest context window and Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5.1", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-luna", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis