Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5.5
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Creator
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 14, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
944K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$4.00
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$20.00
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
57.6 (best)
39.5
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: summary

Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $4.00/1M input and $20.00/1M output tokens and scores 57.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 20× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the largest context window and Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis