Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5.1
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Creator
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Sep 14, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
944K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
51.2 (best)
39.5
CodingArtificial Analysis index
79.1
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 50× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the largest context window and Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5.1", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis