DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
Creator
DeepSeek
MoonshotAI
Released
Sep 14, 2026
Jul 16, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K
1.05M (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4
Providers
5 (best)
4
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.5
43.6 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
76.2
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
7.4s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
No

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 14× cheaper than the next model and Kimi K3 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis