Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
Creator
Anthropic
MoonshotAI
Released
Sep 28, 2026
Jul 16, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
1.05M (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.00 (best)
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00 (best)
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4
Providers
1
4 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
56.0 (best)
43.6
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
76.2
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
7.4s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
No

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3: summary

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Kimi K3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Sonnet 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $10.00/1M output tokens and scores 56.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model, Kimi K3 has the largest context window and Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis