Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.4

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
GPT-5.4OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.4
Creator
MoonshotAI
OpenAI
Released
Jul 16, 2026
Mar 5, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M (best)
Max output
1.05M (best)
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4
$2.50$2.50–$2.75 across 2 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4 (best)
$15.00$15.00–$16.50 across 2
Providers
4 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
43.6 (best)
39.0
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.2 (best)
71.1
LatencyMedian time to first token
7.4s (best)
19s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
<1 t/s (best)
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.4: summary

Kimi K3 and GPT-5.4 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.4, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $2.50/1M input and $15.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.4 is the cheapest on input, 1.1× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.4 has the largest context window, Kimi K3 scores highest for intelligence, Kimi K3 leads on coding and GPT-5.4 has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.4", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis