Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.4

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5.1
GPT-5.4OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.4
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Mar 5, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$2.50$2.50–$2.75 across 2 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$15.00$15.00–$16.50 across 2 (best)
Providers
1
2 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
51.2 (best)
39.0
CodingArtificial Analysis index
79.1 (best)
71.1
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
19s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.4: summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.4 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.4, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $2.50/1M input and $15.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.4 is the cheapest on input, 4× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.4 has the largest context window, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Fable 5.1 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5.1", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.4", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis