DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
DeepSeek
Z.ai
Released
Sep 14, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5
Providers
5
5
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.5
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
74.8
Accepts
Text, Image
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 2.8× cheaper than the next model and GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis