DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Grok 4.6xAIx-ai/grok-4.6
Creator
DeepSeek
xAI
Released
Sep 14, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
500K
Max output
944K (best)
500K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
$2.00
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
$6.00
Providers
5 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.5
44.3 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
76.8
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
No

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.6 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.6, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 44.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 10× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the largest context window and Grok 4.6 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.6", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis