DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.7-flash
Creator
DeepSeek
Google
Released
Sep 14, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.20$0.20–$0.30 across 5 (best)
$0.75
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60$0.60–$1.20 across 5 (best)
$3.75
Providers
5 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.5 (best)
39.1
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
76.1
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
No
Reasoning
No
No

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 3.7 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.20/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 39.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.7 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 3.8× cheaper than the next model and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.7-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis