Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5.1
GPT-6 AstraOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-astra
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$10.00
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$50.00
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
51.2 (best)
50.9
CodingArtificial Analysis index
79.1 (best)
77.1
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra: summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Astra, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 50.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Fable 5.1 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5.1", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-astra", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis