Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Grok 4.6xAIx-ai/grok-4.6
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
xAI
Z.ai
Released
Aug 12, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
500K
1.31M (best)
Max output
500K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.00
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$6.00
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
44.3 (best)
41.8
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.8 (best)
71.5
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Grok 4.6 and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Grok 4.6, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 44.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 29× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window, Grok 4.6 scores highest for intelligence and Grok 4.6 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.6", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis