Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5.1
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
Anthropic
Z.ai
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1M
1.31M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
51.2 (best)
41.8
CodingArtificial Analysis index
79.1 (best)
71.5
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Claude Fable 5.1 and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 143× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Fable 5.1 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5.1", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis