GPT-6 Luna vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-luna
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
OpenAI
Z.ai
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
400K
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10 (best)
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.50 (best)
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
38.1
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
—
74.8
Accepts
Files, Image, Text
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

GPT-6 Luna vs GLM-5.3: summary

GPT-6 Luna and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

GPT-6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 400,000-token context window, costs $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 38.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna is the cheapest on input, 5.6× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3 has the largest context window and GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-luna", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis