GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
GPT-6 AstraOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-astra
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
OpenAI
Z.ai
Released
Sep 4, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
1.05M
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
50.9 (best)
44.8
CodingArtificial Analysis index
77.1 (best)
74.8
Accepts
Text, Image
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3: summary

GPT-6 Astra and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

GPT-6 Astra, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 50.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3 is the cheapest on input, 18× cheaper than the next model, GPT-6 Astra has the largest context window, GPT-6 Astra scores highest for intelligence and GPT-6 Astra leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-astra", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis