GPT-5.4 vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
GPT-5.4OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.4
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
OpenAI
Z.ai
Released
Mar 5, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
1.05M
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.50$2.50–$2.75 across 2
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$15.00$15.00–$16.50 across 2
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5 (best)
Providers
2
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.0
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
71.1
74.8 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
19s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

GPT-5.4 vs GLM-5.3: summary

GPT-5.4 and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

GPT-5.4, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $2.50/1M input and $15.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3 is the cheapest on input, 4.5× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.4 has the largest context window, GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence and GLM-5.3 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.4", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis