Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
Grok 4.6xAIx-ai/grok-4.6
Creator
MoonshotAI
xAI
Released
Jul 16, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
500K
Max output
1.05M (best)
500K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4
$2.00 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4
$6.00 (best)
Providers
4 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
43.6
44.3 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.2
76.8 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
7.4s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
No

Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6: summary

Kimi K3 and Grok 4.6 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.6, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 44.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.6 is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model, Kimi K3 has the largest context window, Grok 4.6 scores highest for intelligence and Grok 4.6 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.6", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis