Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
Grok 4.5xAIx-ai/grok-4.5
Creator
MoonshotAI
xAI
Released
Jul 16, 2026
Jul 8, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
500K
Max output
1.05M (best)
500K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4
$2.00 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4
$6.00 (best)
Providers
4 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
43.6 (best)
38.8
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.2 (best)
72.4
LatencyMedian time to first token
7.4s (best)
81s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
<1 t/s (best)
Accepts
Text, Image
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
No

Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5: summary

Kimi K3 and Grok 4.5 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.5, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 38.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.5 is the cheapest on input, 1.4× cheaper than the next model, Kimi K3 has the largest context window, Kimi K3 scores highest for intelligence, Kimi K3 leads on coding and Grok 4.5 has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.5", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis