Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Kimi K3MoonshotAImoonshotai/kimi-k3
GPT-5.5OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.5
Creator
MoonshotAI
OpenAI
Released
Jul 16, 2026
Apr 24, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M (best)
Max output
1.05M (best)
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.70$2.70–$3.00 across 4 (best)
$5.00$5.00–$5.50 across 2
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$13.50$13.50–$15.00 across 4 (best)
$30.00$30.00–$33.00 across 2
Providers
4 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
43.6 (best)
38.4
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.2 (best)
74.9
LatencyMedian time to first token
7.4s
6.1s (best)
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s (best)
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5: summary

Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Kimi K3, from MoonshotAI, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.70/1M input and $13.50/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.5, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $30.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 38.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Kimi K3 is the cheapest on input, 1.9× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.5 has the largest context window, Kimi K3 scores highest for intelligence, Kimi K3 leads on coding and Kimi K3 has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="moonshotai/kimi-k3", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.5", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis