Mistral Nemo vs Grok 4.7

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Mistral NemoMistralAImistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Grok 4.7xAIx-ai/grok-4.7
Creator
MistralAI
xAI
Released
Jul 19, 2024
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
131K
500K (best)
Max output
16K
500K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$2.00
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$6.00
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
5.2
35.0 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
3.3s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text
Text, Image
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
No

Mistral Nemo vs Grok 4.7: summary

Mistral Nemo and Grok 4.7 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Mistral Nemo, from MistralAI, has a 131,072-token context window, costs $0.03/1M input and $0.03/1M output tokens and scores 5.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Grok 4.7, from xAI, has a 500,000-token context window, costs $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens and scores 35.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Mistral Nemo is the cheapest on input, 67× cheaper than the next model, Grok 4.7 has the largest context window and Grok 4.7 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="x-ai/grok-4.7", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis