Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral Nemo

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Mistral NemoMistralAImistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Creator
Anthropic
MistralAI
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Jul 19, 2024
Context window
1M (best)
131K
Max output
128K (best)
16K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$4.00
$0.03 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$20.00
$0.03 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
58.4 (best)
5.2
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
3.3s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral Nemo: summary

Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral Nemo are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $4.00/1M input and $20.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 58.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Mistral Nemo, from MistralAI, has a 131,072-token context window, costs $0.03/1M input and $0.03/1M output tokens and scores 5.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Mistral Nemo is the cheapest on input, 133× cheaper than the next model, Claude Opus 5.5 has the largest context window and Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis