Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 27B

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Mistral NemoMistralAImistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Qwen3.8 27BAlibabaqwen/qwen3.8-27b
Creator
MistralAI
Alibaba
Released
Jul 19, 2024
Aug 14, 2025
Context window
131K
262K (best)
Max output
16K
33K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$0.40
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$3.00
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
5.2
20.1 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
3.3s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
No

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 27B: summary

Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.8 27B are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Mistral Nemo, from MistralAI, has a 131,072-token context window, costs $0.03/1M input and $0.03/1M output tokens and scores 5.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Qwen3.8 27B, from Alibaba, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.40/1M input and $3.00/1M output tokens and scores 20.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Mistral Nemo is the cheapest on input, 13× cheaper than the next model, Qwen3.8 27B has the largest context window and Qwen3.8 27B scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="qwen/qwen3.8-27b", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis