Mistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Luna

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Mistral NemoMistralAImistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-luna
Creator
MistralAI
OpenAI
Released
Jul 19, 2024
Sep 22, 2026
Context window
131K
400K (best)
Max output
16K
128K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$0.10
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.03 (best)
$0.50
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
5.2
27.8 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
3.3s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Mistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Luna: summary

Mistral Nemo and GPT-6 Luna are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Mistral Nemo, from MistralAI, has a 131,072-token context window, costs $0.03/1M input and $0.03/1M output tokens and scores 5.2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 400,000-token context window, costs $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 27.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Mistral Nemo is the cheapest on input, 3.3× cheaper than the next model, GPT-6 Luna has the largest context window and GPT-6 Luna scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-luna", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis