Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Muse Spark 1.2Metameta/muse-spark-1.2
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
Meta
Z.ai
Released
Aug 22, 2025
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.31M (best)
Max output
131K
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$1.25
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$4.25
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.6
41.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
72.2 (best)
71.5
Accepts
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Files
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Muse Spark 1.2 and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Muse Spark 1.2, from Meta, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $1.25/1M input and $4.25/1M output tokens and scores 39.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 18× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window, GLM-5.3-Flash scores highest for intelligence and Muse Spark 1.2 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="meta/muse-spark-1.2", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis