Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-5.4

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Muse Spark 1.2Metameta/muse-spark-1.2
GPT-5.4OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.4
Creator
Meta
OpenAI
Released
Aug 22, 2025
Mar 5, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M (best)
Max output
131K (best)
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$1.25 (best)
$2.50$2.50–$2.75 across 2
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$4.25 (best)
$15.00$15.00–$16.50 across 2
Providers
1
2 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
39.6 (best)
39.0
CodingArtificial Analysis index
72.2 (best)
71.1
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
19s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Files
Text, Image, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-5.4: summary

Muse Spark 1.2 and GPT-5.4 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Muse Spark 1.2, from Meta, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $1.25/1M input and $4.25/1M output tokens and scores 39.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.4, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $2.50/1M input and $15.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 39.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Muse Spark 1.2 is the cheapest on input, 2× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.4 has the largest context window, Muse Spark 1.2 scores highest for intelligence and Muse Spark 1.2 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="meta/muse-spark-1.2", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.4", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis