Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGooglegoogle/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIopenai/gpt-6.1-terra
Creator
Google
OpenAI
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Oct 26, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M (best)
Max output
66K
128K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.30 (best)
$1.00
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$2.50 (best)
$5.00
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
11.7
51.0 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
1.4s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text, Image, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6.1 Terra: summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-6.1 Terra are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.30/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 11.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6.1 Terra, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs $1.00/1M input and $5.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the cheapest on input, 3.3× cheaper than the next model, GPT-6.1 Terra has the largest context window and GPT-6.1 Terra scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6.1-terra", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis