Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5.5
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIopenai/gpt-6.1-terra
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Oct 26, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$4.00
$1.00 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$20.00
$5.00 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
58.4 (best)
51.0
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra: summary

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $4.00/1M input and $20.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 58.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6.1 Terra, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs $1.00/1M input and $5.00/1M output tokens and scores 51.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6.1 Terra is the cheapest on input, 4× cheaper than the next model, GPT-6.1 Terra has the largest context window and Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6.1-terra", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis