DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
DeepSeek
Z.ai
Released
Oct 17, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
944K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.10$0.10–$0.30 across 4 (best)
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.29$0.29–$1.20 across 4 (best)
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5
Providers
4
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
32.5 (best)
31.7
Accepts
Text, Image
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3: summary

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 31.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the cheapest on input, 5.6× cheaper than the next model and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis