DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIAnvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl
Creator
DeepSeek
NVIDIA
Released
Apr 24, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
262K
Max output
384K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$1.30$1.30–$2.40 across 4
$0.15 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$2.60$2.60–$4.80 across 4
$0.50 (best)
Providers
4 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
23.1 (best)
13.6
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.9s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4 Pro, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $1.30/1M input and $2.60/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 23.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, from NVIDIA, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.15/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 13.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is the cheapest on input, 8.7× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window and DeepSeek V4 Pro scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="nvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis