Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5.5
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
Creator
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Apr 24, 2026
Context window
1M
1.05M (best)
Max output
128K
384K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$4.00
$1.74$1.74–$2.40 across 3 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$20.00
$3.48$3.48–$4.80 across 3 (best)
Providers
3
3
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
58.4 (best)
23.1
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
4.9s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: summary

Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5.5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $4.00/1M input and $20.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 58.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4 Pro, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $1.74/1M input and $3.48/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 23.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the cheapest on input, 2.3× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window and Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5.5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis