DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
Creator
DeepSeek
Google
Released
Apr 24, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
384K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$1.74$1.74–$2.40 across 3
$0.75 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.48$3.48–$4.80 across 3 (best)
$3.75
Providers
3 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
23.1
30.5 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.9s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemini 3.8 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4 Pro, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $1.74/1M input and $3.48/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 23.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 30.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the cheapest on input, 2.3× cheaper than the next model and Gemini 3.8 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis