DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekdeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGooglegoogle/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Creator
DeepSeek
Google
Released
Apr 24, 2026
Jul 21, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M
Max output
384K (best)
66K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$1.74$1.74–$2.40 across 3
$0.30 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.48$3.48–$4.80 across 3
$2.50 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
23.1 (best)
11.7
LatencyMedian time to first token
4.9s
1.4s (best)
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s (best)
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
No
Reasoning
Yes
No

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: summary

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

DeepSeek V4 Pro, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $1.74/1M input and $3.48/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 23.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.30/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 11.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the cheapest on input, 5.8× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4 Pro scores highest for intelligence and DeepSeek V4 Pro has the highest throughput.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis