Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Opus 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-opus-5
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIopenai/gpt-6-luna
Creator
Anthropic
OpenAI
Released
Jul 24, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Context window
1M (best)
400K
Max output
128K
128K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$5.00
$0.10 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$25.00
$0.50 (best)
Providers
3 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
48.1 (best)
38.1
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.5
—
LatencyMedian time to first token
30s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Luna: summary

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Luna are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Opus 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $25.00/1M output tokens across 3 providers and scores 48.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna, from OpenAI, has a 400,000-token context window, costs $0.10/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens and scores 38.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-6 Luna is the cheapest on input, 50× cheaper than the next model, Claude Opus 5 has the largest context window and Claude Opus 5 scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-6-luna", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis