Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Claude Fable 5Anthropicanthropic/claude-fable-5
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
Anthropic
Z.ai
Released
Jun 9, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1M
1.31M (best)
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$50.00
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
49.6 (best)
41.8
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.5 (best)
71.5
LatencyMedian time to first token
14s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Files
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Claude Fable 5, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 49.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 143× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window, Claude Fable 5 scores highest for intelligence and Claude Fable 5 leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="anthropic/claude-fable-5", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis