Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.
Estimate monthly cost for these modelsClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: summary
Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.
Claude Fable 5.1, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens and scores 47.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.10/1M input and $0.29/1M output tokens across 4 providers and scores 32.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the cheapest on input, 100× cheaper than the next model, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the largest context window and Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest for intelligence.
Switch with one line
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6 Astra
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis