Qwen3.8 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Qwen3.8 27BAlibabaqwen/qwen3.8-27b
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomixiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Creator
Alibaba
Xiaomi
Released
Aug 14, 2025
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
262K
1.05M (best)
Max output
131K
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.15$0.15–$0.40 across 2
$0.14 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$1.88$1.88–$3.00 across 2
$0.28 (best)
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
20.1
26.7 (best)
Accepts
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Qwen3.8 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: summary

Qwen3.8 27B and MiMo V2.6 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Qwen3.8 27B, from Alibaba, has a 262,144-token context window, costs from $0.15/1M input and $1.88/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 20.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash, from Xiaomi, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens and scores 26.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash is the cheapest on input, 1.1× cheaper than the next model, MiMo V2.6 Flash has the largest context window and MiMo V2.6 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="qwen/qwen3.8-27b", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis