GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIopenai/gpt-5.6-sol
GLM-5.3Z.aiz-ai/glm-5.3
Creator
OpenAI
Z.ai
Released
Jul 9, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
1.05M
Max output
128K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$4.00
$0.56$0.56–$1.40 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$20.00
$2.50$2.50–$4.40 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
42.3
44.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
77.2 (best)
74.8
LatencyMedian time to first token
5.7s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3: summary

GPT-5.6 Sol and GLM-5.3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

GPT-5.6 Sol, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs $4.00/1M input and $20.00/1M output tokens and scores 42.3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.56/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 44.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3 is the cheapest on input, 7.1× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.6 Sol has the largest context window, GLM-5.3 scores highest for intelligence and GPT-5.6 Sol leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.6-sol", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis