LogoFastRouter

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIAnvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomixiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Creator
NVIDIA
Xiaomi
Released
May 16, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
262K
1.05M (best)
Max output
16K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.50
$0.14 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$2.20
$0.28 (best)
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
11.8
26.7 (best)
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: summary

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B and MiMo V2.6 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B, from NVIDIA, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.50/1M input and $2.20/1M output tokens and scores 11.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash, from Xiaomi, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens and scores 26.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Flash is the cheapest on input, 3.6× cheaper than the next model, MiMo V2.6 Flash has the largest context window and MiMo V2.6 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis