MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMinimaxminimax/minimax-m3.1-flash
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
Minimax
Z.ai
Released
Oct 19, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1M
1.31M (best)
Max output
524K (best)
131K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.15
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.60
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
28.9 (best)
27.8
Accepts
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash, from Minimax, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens and scores 28.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 27.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 2.1× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window and MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="minimax/minimax-m3.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis