Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIinclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
inclusionAI
Z.ai
Released
Oct 2, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
262K
1.31M (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.07 (best)
$0.14$0.14–$0.15 across 5
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.22 (best)
$0.45$0.45–$0.50 across 5
Providers
1
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
29.6 (best)
27.8
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Ling 3.1 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Ling 3.1 Flash, from inclusionAI, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.07/1M input and $0.22/1M output tokens and scores 29.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.14/1M input and $0.45/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 27.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 2× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window and Ling 3.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis