LogoFastRouter

Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIinclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomixiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro
Creator
inclusionAI
Xiaomi
Released
Oct 2, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Context window
262K
1.05M (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.07 (best)
$0.39
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.22 (best)
$0.78
Providers
1
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
29.6
29.9 (best)
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro: summary

Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Pro are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Ling 3.1 Flash, from inclusionAI, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.07/1M input and $0.22/1M output tokens and scores 29.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiMo V2.6 Pro, from Xiaomi, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs $0.39/1M input and $0.78/1M output tokens and scores 29.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 5.6× cheaper than the next model, MiMo V2.6 Pro has the largest context window and MiMo V2.6 Pro scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis