Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIinclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIAnvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl
Creator
inclusionAI
NVIDIA
Released
Oct 2, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
Context window
262K
262K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.07 (best)
$0.15
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.22 (best)
$0.50
Providers
1
2 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
29.6 (best)
13.6
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: summary

Ling 3.1 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Ling 3.1 Flash, from inclusionAI, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.07/1M input and $0.22/1M output tokens and scores 29.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, from NVIDIA, has a 262,144-token context window, costs from $0.15/1M input and $0.50/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 13.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 2.1× cheaper than the next model and Ling 3.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="nvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis