Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIinclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
MiniMax M3Minimaxminimax/minimax-m3
Creator
inclusionAI
Minimax
Released
Oct 2, 2026
May 31, 2026
Context window
262K
1M (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.07 (best)
$0.28$0.28–$0.30 across 2
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$0.22 (best)
$1.10$1.10–$1.20 across 2
Providers
1
2 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
29.6 (best)
18.9
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
3.1s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes

Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3: summary

Ling 3.1 Flash and MiniMax M3 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Ling 3.1 Flash, from inclusionAI, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.07/1M input and $0.22/1M output tokens and scores 29.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

MiniMax M3, from Minimax, has a 1,000,000-token context window, costs from $0.28/1M input and $1.10/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 18.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 4× cheaper than the next model, MiniMax M3 has the largest context window and Ling 3.1 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="minimax/minimax-m3", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis