Gemini 4 Argon vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Gemini 4 ArgonGooglegoogle/gemini-4-argon
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIAnvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
Creator
Google
NVIDIA
Released
Oct 13, 2026
May 16, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
262K
Max output
66K (best)
16K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$2.00
$0.50 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$10.00
$2.20 (best)
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
50.4 (best)
11.8
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 4 Argon vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: summary

Gemini 4 Argon and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 4 Argon, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $2.00/1M input and $10.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 50.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B, from NVIDIA, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.50/1M input and $2.20/1M output tokens and scores 11.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is the cheapest on input, 4× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 4 Argon has the largest context window and Gemini 4 Argon scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-4-argon", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis