Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiz-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Creator
Google
Z.ai
Released
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.31M (best)
Max output
66K
131K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.75
$0.07$0.07–$0.15 across 5 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.75
$0.25$0.25–$0.50 across 5 (best)
Providers
2
5 (best)
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
40.9
41.8 (best)
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.3 (best)
71.5
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash: summary

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 40.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,310,720-token context window, costs from $0.07/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens across 5 providers and scores 41.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheapest on input, 11× cheaper than the next model, GLM-5.3-Flash has the largest context window, GLM-5.3-Flash scores highest for intelligence and Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis