Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.5

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Metric
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
GPT-5.5OpenAIopenai/gpt-5.5
Creator
Google
OpenAI
Released
Sep 2, 2026
Apr 24, 2026
Context window
1.05M
1.05M (best)
Max output
66K
128K (best)
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.75 (best)
$5.00$5.00–$5.50 across 2
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.75 (best)
$30.00$30.00–$33.00 across 2
Providers
2
2
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
40.9 (best)
38.4
CodingArtificial Analysis index
76.3 (best)
74.9
LatencyMedian time to first token
—
6.1s
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
—
<1 t/s
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Files, Image, Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.5: summary

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.5 are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 40.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

GPT-5.5, from OpenAI, has a 1,050,000-token context window, costs from $5.00/1M input and $30.00/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 38.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the cheapest on input, 6.7× cheaper than the next model, GPT-5.5 has the largest context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores highest for intelligence and Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on coding.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="openai/gpt-5.5", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis