Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIAnvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
Creator
Google
NVIDIA
Released
Sep 2, 2026
May 16, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
262K
Max output
66K (best)
16K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.75
$0.50 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.75
$2.20 (best)
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
30.8 (best)
11.8
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: summary

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 30.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B, from NVIDIA, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.50/1M input and $2.20/1M output tokens and scores 11.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is the cheapest on input, 1.5× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 3.8 Flash has the largest context window and Gemini 3.8 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis