Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglegoogle/gemini-3.8-flash
Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIinclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
Creator
Google
inclusionAI
Released
Sep 2, 2026
Oct 2, 2026
Context window
1.05M (best)
262K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.75
$0.07 (best)
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$3.75
$0.22 (best)
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
30.8 (best)
29.6
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
Yes

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash: summary

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.8 Flash, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 30.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash, from inclusionAI, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.07/1M input and $0.22/1M output tokens and scores 29.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheapest on input, 11× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 3.8 Flash has the largest context window and Gemini 3.8 Flash scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.8-flash", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis