Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 27B

Side-by-side pricing per provider, context window, benchmark scores and speed, all on one OpenAI-compatible API.

Estimate monthly cost for these models
Metric
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGooglegoogle/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Qwen3.8 27BAlibabaqwen/qwen3.8-27b
Creator
Google
Alibaba
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Aug 14, 2025
Context window
1.05M (best)
262K
Max output
66K (best)
33K
Input / 1MLowest provider price
$0.30 (best)
$0.40
Output / 1MLowest provider price
$2.50 (best)
$3.00
Providers
2 (best)
1
IntelligenceArtificial Analysis index
11.7
20.1 (best)
LatencyMedian time to first token
1.4s
—
ThroughputMedian tokens per second
<1 t/s
—
Accepts
Text, Image, Audio, Video, Files
Text, Image, Video
Produces
Text
Text
Tool calling
Yes
Yes
Structured output
No
Yes
Reasoning
No
No

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 27B: summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.8 27B are both available through FastRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so switching between them is a change of model id, not a new integration.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, from Google, has a 1,048,576-token context window, costs from $0.30/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens across 2 providers and scores 11.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Qwen3.8 27B, from Alibaba, has a 262,144-token context window, costs $0.40/1M input and $3.00/1M output tokens and scores 20.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the cheapest on input, 1.3× cheaper than the next model, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the largest context window and Qwen3.8 27B scores highest for intelligence.

Switch with one line

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.fastrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key="<FASTROUTER_API_KEY>") client.chat.completions.create(model="google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite", messages=[...]) # or client.chat.completions.create(model="qwen/qwen3.8-27b", messages=[...])
Full API docs

Frequently asked questions

More comparisons

Benchmark scores sourced from ArtificialAnalysis